Because of Bill Clinton - President William Jefferson Clinton - it is most improbable now that any national Democrat can offer a bi-partisan road forward. Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton oddly, for her purported "feminism", is secured it seems as FLOTUS Hillary of the Clinton Foundation - as First Lady of the Clintons' global initiatives.
Because of the partisan political first steps of the Clinton administration per the Middle East as it dates to the Year of the Founders' Lord one thousand nine hundred and Ninety three the politics of the People of the United States of America are undermined. President Clinton is remembered for a lawyer trickery like a used car salesman of the lower ranks of strategery for pushing lemons as sound vehicles.
The threat reports of the United States as per the Middle East and our long history of Cold War involvements are yet corrected or properly of sufficient factoring for the variables related to the first move of the Clinton administration with a group of Middle East leaders so of he requesting that they contractually agree to just blame all 'anti-American' sentiment and justifications on Republicans. It was a cheap trick to akin to the low ranks of thought stereotypes for used car salesmen. It is a wrench still in the gears of the foreign affairs of the United States and as well all "intelligence" derived within. It is that President Clinton is remembered for locking in a group of Middle East leaders to not blame him or Democrats for any or all of the Cold War years, at least, and to give him a clean slate - and that such to him was for a way to then avoid the action and commitment for the US relationships that better would have been with him to working to resolve in lieu of just blaming.
A slippery slope or an impossible oil slick for even a pedestrian navigation of current US relations across the Middle East is much the crash lawyering trickery of President Clinton akin to his reputation as "Slick Willy" for it seems having a slippery fork tongued (disbarred) esquired willingness to stand and present himself of an innocence while more of a guilt.
The people of the Middle East are of an honor and pride themselves in being honorable for their sense of honor. The leaders of the Middle East seem foremost among those that pride themselves on being honorable for their sense of honor.
President Clinton's crass cheap tricks in politics to bias history of his first year and first steps developed to be much lacking in honor. President Clinton's "diplomacy" haunts now our foreign relations and ability to properly interpret intelligence --- He as remembered so was to trapping a people of their sense of honor in a contract he then enforced to his selfish purposes and in ways that then held other "leaders" to a performance to keep up their end of his "bargain" to just blame Republicans.
This is remembered while remembering also that such fits with my first bad first impression of Bill and Hillary from the early 1970s in the year or two before Watergate. I have known Bill and Hillary since their law school days for it was that they polled my as a young youth to whether they could both become President of the United States of America some day. It is remembered that from my first meeting of Bill Clinton I found him willing to lie and as well to ask a near first grader to lie to and in support of his lying as to what such's God's honest answer was to his querying.
There is a much longer story in the how and why of their rise in the 1992 election cycle for me to tell in coming years as of how for all the leading help they got from me after my initial guidance to Democrats as to how they could win in 1992 it was that much that came from me that has long benefited the Clintons after getting on such a wagon of mine was long firstly figured otherwise to be to protecting people from them specifically. For now let me just say that though I did tell them that if they entered and learned how to sound like me they could win, and, that I wasn't intending my help and guidance for Democrats to be enough to get them elected. I was meaning to make sure President Bush had an actual credible opponent in the 1992 race and hadn't figured the entrance of Ross Perot. I was of my original opinion of the Clintons then and yet helping them to seem more electable than even I thought they were as a matter in my mind about national security. I was of such opinions and a hope to flush these two out for a single use as disposable politicians.
On the honor of the code of honor honorable among the people and leaders whence and now of the Middle East it is that our systems are still corrupted by the first steps and the performance President Clinton insisted upon as per the improper "contract" he worked so of a promise that only Republicans would be blamed for the past problems and that too he would have it interpreted that such promise was to avoid blaming him as long as he was still in office.
There is very little honor in this as how President Clinton (the Clintons) can be remembered.
As for our story and how it was of years and decades of Bill and Hillary checking in while of their political plotting at times of wondering if 'that charming boy from the school yard' was of thinking they then were trying to go too far - we have a special relationship - and especially special relationship since so much good I worked was actually firstly figured in parts to be bulwarks against them and their shared plotting. It is ridiculous how they are still too well considered for "successes" that only came to be from work long as prophylactics against them. It is ridiculous but how when I stopped protecting us and them from themselves they weren't even then able to defeat the near unknown junior peer of Senator Hillary Clinton in the 2008 race. I have comfort in my knowledge of the decades about such conflicted politics of how I did help and then not help in order to asses and know how when I helped them they looked good or great and when I withheld pro-active voluntary efforts they mostly stumbled and bumbled.
There is an honor I hope in my years of work after my efforts at knowingly helping the Clintons seem better and more electable than even I thought they were for it of voluntary and proactive work to many years and trying times at then a business too "proactive" and "voluntary" to mediate and reduce the risks of and from the Clintons if and when left to be themselves politically. There is that after they were unexpectedly elected (for the lack of a factoring of Ross Perot) I thought I had a responsibility to keep trying to save Democrats from themselves to then save what could be saved of the People more generally.
Essentially it may be the worst of Bill Clinton as "Slick Willy" that he proceeded as President in foreign policy that not only asked the Middle East to bias history with sole blaming of Republicans for all that was wrong but to then put them on their honor to continue just blaming the Republicans for all those years that the Clinton Administration's avoidance and inaction was diabolical "politics" actually of his hands not Republicans.
It is so also remembered and due finally a dealing with that while holding such some remembered Middle East leaders to he secured promise to not blame him or Democrats he was then firstly of his work to have such be a contract also of a promise that with such would be a promise to not attack America - The homeland of the United States of America - about such as they were to just blame Republicans about - as long as he was still in office.
Syria now presents and opportunity for the known world and all of the United States of America to get the history and politics of their times all wrong anew. These days are the days we need to open a dialogue about what did and has gone wrong because President Clinton thought his "lawyering" trickery of his reputation of short of honor as "Slick Willy" could provide a foundations for lasting understanding and lasting growth.
It is that I just hope that how the 911 Commission work has been flawed from their start and so about a "prudence" proffered, however, as if looking back just ten years to understand Al Qaeda would be intelligent or telling isn't of a politics of the Clintons at a lobbying about such to keep the Government of the United States of America from looking far enough back - to looking just back 12 -14 years - to looking just back to the conception/birth of Al Qaeda - to looking far enough back to clearly unearth a (legally) buried "contracted" culpability or just gross negligence.
It is that it seems while near another anniversary of the attacks of 9/11 by Al Qaeda it figures most simply that we got attacked because President Clinton had failed to sufficiently prosecute Saddam Hussein even just for his invasion of Kuwait. It is slippery more though and still how our paths for an understanding as it now is needed most with Syria conflicts stirring are of risks for a lack of understanding that President Clinton actually spent his eight years trapping Middle East leaders, as remembered, on their honor of his worked promise to just blame Republicans and to not be to any attacks on the homeland of the US while he was still President.
It is simply now also important to consider and debate how it seems the attacks of 9/11/2001 were planned and prepared for for years before those first months of the Administration of George W. Bush and as it was that globally those times were of an expectation that the next President of the United States was most likely to be Al Gore.